Why dont LIEbrals understand that auto insurance is mandatory only if you are going to drive a car? How will Obama’s voluntary health insurance plan force anyone to do ...
Why dont LIEbrals understand that auto insurance is mandatory only if you are going to drive a car? How can liberals compare mandatory auto insurance to mandatory health ...
Why dont LIEbrals understand that auto insurance is mandatory only if you are going to drive a car? Mandated Health Insurance is different from Mandated Auto Insurance how?
... auto insurance. Your insurance company must send you a copy with your policy. Read it to understand ... You will only receive the amount of your car’s ... you drive in other U.S ...
Having had mandatory auto insurance over a ... and the government going to understand ... do not want to buy auto insurance you do not have to drive or own a car.
... insurance protection if you drive one. The auto ... you only need liability insurance ... Car Insurance in Texas?. Auto insurance is mandatory in the state of Texas, and you...
... You must have auto insurance to legally drive ... you can. Look at mandatory car insurance, the legally required coverage usually only ... WHY if you are not Rich and You dont ...
... you still need your state's minimum auto insurance ... car new or used they dont tell you that with gap insurance ... understand that if the come out and tell me my car is only ...
... drive the vehicle as well. "As a rule of thumb, only the ... about auto insurance, people say if you get a red sports car, that's ... where car insurance is mandatory ...
Reality Has A Conservative Bias 5:00 am on May 18, 2010
Libs dont understand common sense and want the nanny state dictatorial government.
Kirby 5:00 am on May 18, 2010
And breathing is only mandatory if you plan on living?
subwm4bush 5:00 am on May 18, 2010
Everyone uses health care. If you do not want to participate in insurance we should be able to deny you emergency room care.
We ALREADY pay into medicare, so it is obviously not unconstitutional.
Alex B. Red Hat Linux 5:00 am on May 18, 2010
Auto insurance protects cars. Health insurance protects life…You don’t have to get health insurance if you’re dead either
Ed 5:00 am on May 18, 2010
Why don’t attention seeking children learn how to spell?
LadyWho 5:00 am on May 18, 2010
But you have a body, which, I assume is your car metaphor, so the argument you have put forth does not make sense.
Capt Cold 5:00 am on May 18, 2010
Take it up with the GOP. It was their demand that there be a mandate.
Sarah Palin 5:00 am on May 18, 2010
Correct.
your point is valid.
Freedom > Govt 5:00 am on May 18, 2010
the insurance mandate is essentially a tax on your life. as you said, you can choose to not drive in order to opt out of auto insurance. however, you can not choose not to live to opt out of the health insurance mandate
do all c0ns have a lobotomy 5:00 am on May 18, 2010
your logic is flawed if you were dead you would have no need for health insurance – you will have the ability to choose still it will just cost you money if you choose no
personally I think this is wrong if you don’t want health insurance don’t buy it – but if you get sick don’t go to the hospital unless you have cash
yutsnark 5:00 am on May 18, 2010
It’s equivalent. Health insurance is mandatory if you own and operate a human body.
This is a case where liberals are smarter than you. By the way, that’s how it’s spelled: "liberals."
Jesus was a Hippie™ 5:00 am on May 18, 2010
Actually Stupid the Liberals are trying to pass a law in California that makes Car Insurance more expensive for people who have been struggling to pay their bills.
In California the Liberals want to make a law that causes insurance rates to go up if you ever miss a payment.
Accountant From Cleveland 5:00 am on May 18, 2010
….and health insurance will be mandatory only if you are alive.
.
0bozo the Marxist Clown 5:00 am on May 18, 2010
Because of the quotes on my profile.
They also don’t seem to see the difference between a State requiring it and the Federal Government doing so. Most don’t seem to realize that the Constitution is a set of rules for the FEDERAL Government to follow not the States.
BabySpittle.com 5:00 am on May 18, 2010
So mandatory auto insurance when you are driving and have the ability to cost others a lot of money.
Understandable.
But then you somehow argue against mandatory insurance when you have the ability to cost others a lot of money, preferring those people’s health costs be paid by those who are insured (when they visit the emergency room).
Conservatives again have trouble making a valid comparison.
honestly63 5:00 am on May 18, 2010
You’re right, it is not the same thing, since most people do not consider "not living" a choice.
I think the point being made is that, if you choose not to buy auto insurance and drive anyway, we taxpayers/insurance holders end up paying the bill. Similarly, if you choose not to buy health insurance, we taxpayers/insurance carriers end up paying your emergency bill (higher costs from the hospitals and insurance carriers).
I thought conservatives were all about personal responsibility, so I would think you’d applaud a bill that makes people more responsible for their behavior.
In fact, if you Google, "Health care mandate Republican idea", you will find that the mandatory coverage idea actually began as a Republican idea.
The last I heard you could choose not to buy health insurance, but you would be charged a penalty, which seems only fair if you will be asking the rest of us to support any emergencies that happen to you later on.